matterbridge/vendor/github.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface
Wim d16645c952
Update mattermost library (#2152)
* Update mattermost library

* Fix linting
2024-05-24 23:08:09 +02:00
..
.travis.yml Update mattermost library (#2152) 2024-05-24 23:08:09 +02:00
LICENSE Update mattermost library (#2152) 2024-05-24 23:08:09 +02:00
README.md Update mattermost library (#2152) 2024-05-24 23:08:09 +02:00
testing.go Update mattermost library (#2152) 2024-05-24 23:08:09 +02:00

go-testing-interface

go-testing-interface is a Go library that exports an interface that *testing.T implements as well as a runtime version you can use in its place.

The purpose of this library is so that you can export test helpers as a public API without depending on the "testing" package, since you can't create a *testing.T struct manually. This lets you, for example, use the public testing APIs to generate mock data at runtime, rather than just at test time.

Usage & Example

For usage and examples see the Godoc.

Given a test helper written using go-testing-interface like this:

import "github.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface"

func TestHelper(t testing.T) {
    t.Fatal("I failed")
}

You can call the test helper in a real test easily:

import "testing"

func TestThing(t *testing.T) {
    TestHelper(t)
}

You can also call the test helper at runtime if needed:

import "github.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface"

func main() {
    TestHelper(&testing.RuntimeT{})
}

Versioning

The tagged version matches the version of Go that the interface is compatible with. For example, the version "1.14.0" is for Go 1.14 and introduced the Cleanup function. The patch version (the ".0" in the prior example) is used to fix any bugs found in this library and has no correlation to the supported Go version.

Why?!

*Why would I call a test helper that takes a testing.T at runtime?

You probably shouldn't. The only use case I've seen (and I've had) for this is to implement a "dev mode" for a service where the test helpers are used to populate mock data, create a mock DB, perhaps run service dependencies in-memory, etc.

Outside of a "dev mode", I've never seen a use case for this and I think there shouldn't be one since the point of the testing.T interface is that you can fail immediately.